JB - What's wrong with 58 Pattern? I recall it as part of my military education. (We changed over from 37 Pattern webbing whilst I was in Boys' Service.) I reckon it's a genuine contribution to military history. Are there any inaccuracies in the article - do you want to correct them? Feel free. (At least one of my articles has been trashed here, but that's another topic.)
Your right it is.... That's why its already been covered in '58 pattern, if there's anything different in 58 pattern feel free to add it to the original, but I cant see any point in a duplicate entry with slightly different spelling.